A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, look for to build their family members home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, where growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying produced by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those people of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing permission by developing a wall further than the boundaries in their web-site, resulting in an encroachment on the Unique Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore parts are subject matter to rigid controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological implications, especially in a sensitive coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their planning authorization, and say the wall, that is partly designed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has because become emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to know the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the lawful timeline.
For the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal see, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely trying to build a relatives home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs have been carried out depending on Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site around design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from incredibly diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic character of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged following the lawful expenditures are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.